- #Iantivirus mac for mac#
- #Iantivirus mac mac os x#
- #Iantivirus mac pro#
- #Iantivirus mac software#
- #Iantivirus mac Pc#
From the MacBook Pro I connected to an AFP share on the iMac and tried to copy a file from the iMac to the local hard drive.
#Iantivirus mac software#
I had Sophos running on an iMac and no antivirus software on a MacBook Pro.
#Iantivirus mac mac os x#
If a malicious Mac application is detected by Sophos, attempting to open the application will result in two Mac OS X dialog boxes informing the user that they can't open the application because it is "not supported on this type of Mac." Thus, Sophos effectively quarantines the files in place.įigure 3 - Malware is not supported on this type of MacĮven trying to access quarantined files from another computer via a network share proves fruitless. Regardless of which option the user chooses, as long as Sophos' on-access scanner is enabled, the file is inaccessible and cannot be opened or even duplicated in the Finder or the Terminal (even using sudo).įigure 2 - When a threat is found, Sophos denies access by default Instead, Sophos displays an alert informing the user that a threat has been detected, with options to open the Quarantine Manager or close the dialog box, and the latter is the default selection. Unlike most full-featured antivirus solutions, the default settings of Sophos Anti-Virus do not automatically delete infected files or prompt users to do so. Neither one detected all the samples, which was expected no antivirus solution detects 100% of infected or potentially dangerous files.įigure 1 - Threat detected by Sophos Anti-Virus Effectiveness ClamXav only detected about 75% as many files as Sophos, although ClamXav detected some files (particularly Windows adware) that Sophos did not detect. I tested Sophos and ClamXav with several hundred samples that I've collected from infected computers, Web sites, and e-mails over the past couple years. Of the three, only Sophos will detect infected Web pages and e-mail attachments as soon as they are downloaded, regardless of the threat's target platform. Neither ClamXav nor iAntiVirus is a comprehensive solution compared to Sophos.
#Iantivirus mac Pc#
PC Tools iAntiVirus is only free for home use, and although it does offer on-access scanning, it only detects Mac-specific malware. Like Sophos, ClamXav detects malware designed for any platform, as opposed to Mac-only malware. Although ClamXav does not provide on-access scanning of the whole computer, it can be manually configured to scan files that are downloaded or copied to specific folders, for example ~/Downloads and ~/Desktop. The two most prominent freeware antivirus solutions are ClamXav () and PC Tools iAntiVirus (), and each is very different from Sophos.ĬlamXav is free for anyone to use in any environment, from home computers to enterprise workstations.
Let's take a look at how Sophos Anti-Virus Home Edition compares to other free alternatives for the Mac. The tests also took into consideration the number of false positives, of which the Sophos engine had "few." In AV-Comparatives' () November 2010 tests of proactive detection of new malware, Sophos Anti-Virus ranked in the top three PC antivirus products, earning the highest certification level (Advanced+). Sophos' antivirus engine is one of the best on the market. Two Mac-specific threats, OSX/Jahlav-C and OSX/DNSCha-E, were each found on about 1 in every 100 Macs scanned. This malware included both Mac-native threats as well as plenty of Java-based malware, which Sophos pointed out "could easily be adapted to download Mac-based threats," as was the case with Boonana.
#Iantivirus mac for mac#
Two weeks after the release of Sophos Anti-Virus for Mac Home Edition, Sophos released a report showing that a significant number of Macs running their software had been infected with malware. The announcement came just one week after SecureMac and Intego had independently published information about new Java-based Mac malware spreading through Facebook and other sites, dubbed Boonana by SecureMac and identified as a variant of the Koobface malware by Intego. Why Mac antivirus software?Įnterprise antivirus maker Sophos announced in November that they would begin offering a free Home Edition of Sophos Anti-Virus to all Mac users. Is it really worthwhile to spend $40 every year to protect a Mac with commercial-grade antivirus software, or to endure the agonizing speed degradation commonly associated with AV? Thanks to Sophos, home users can now have quality protection without these frustrations. In the home environment, however, there are no such requirements, and Mac users have debated for years about whether they should go to the trouble of running antivirus software. Real World Review: Sophos Anti-Virus for Mac, Home EditionĬolumn Tag: Real World Review Real World Review: Sophos Anti-Virus for Mac, Home Edition Enterprise-grade antivirus software, now freeīusinesses are often required by laws and company policies to run antivirus software on all their computers, Macs included. Educational Institution and Student Discounts.
0 kommentar(er)
